Wiki+Rubric

Great work team x - Below in red are what I believe reflect your work on this case presentation. The "Contribution to the Group" will be added to the final score on an individual basis. Depending on your individual contributions, your scores will fall between. My observations of your team while working on the case and your journal reports will assist me in making the individual score. If you have any additional comments about contributions you can post them in your journal. Again, great job!
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Excellent ** || ** Very Good ** || ** Average ** || ** Needs Improvement ** ||
 * **// Content //** || Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. || Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. || Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors. || Content is minimal, OR there are several factual errors. ||
 * // Organization // || Content is well organized, using headings (those given in the research guide) or bulleted lists to group related material. Content flows and is logically presented throughout. || Content uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, the overall organization of topics is very good. || Content is logically organized for the most part. || There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts. ||
 * // Attractiveness // || Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation. || Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation. || Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content. || Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but these often distract from the presentation content. ||
 * // Contribution to the Group // || Contributes greatly to the development of the team wiki. || Contributes adequately to the development of the team wiki. || Contributes moderately to the development of the team wiki. || Contributes minimally to the development of the team wiki. ||
 * // Accuracy // || No misspellings or grammatical errors. No HTML errors in wiki (e.g., broken links, missing images). || Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors. No more than two HTML errors in the student's contribution to the wiki. || Four misspellings and/or grammatical errors. No more than four HTML errors in the student's contribution to the wiki. || More than four errors in spelling or grammar. Five or more HTML errors in the student's contribution to the wiki. ||

Source: NCTE/IRA. Read-Write-Think, 2006